< Browse > Home / Bill Johnson/Bethel Church, Miscellaneous, Size and Influence of the NAR / Blog article: Should our church sing Bethel Music worship songs?

Should our church sing Bethel Music worship songs?

bethel music tides album cover artA frequent question I hear has to do with the music being made by groups coming out of Bethel Redding and other churches that have New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) beliefs. The question is, is it OK to sing their songs as long as the lyrics don’t contain any error?

By way of background, Bethel Music, a popular record label, is known for producing high quality music, and their songs are sung in churches across America on Sunday mornings–not just in NAR churches, but even in many mainstream evangelical and non-denominational churches. And the truth is that many of the people in these churches sing along, having no idea that these songs come from a leading church in an aberrant movement. I, myself, have sung along with songs in church or on the radio, only later to discover that those songs came from Bethel Music.

Churchgoers who are aware of the songs’ origins sometimes feel conflicted singing along. And worship leaders face a dilemma of whether to include anything from Bethel Music in their weekly song selection.

Recently, someone called Grek Koukl’s podcast and asked Greg this very question–about whether it’s OK to sing songs made by Bethel Music, as long as the lyrics contain no obvious error. I thought Greg’s answer was spot on, so I’m including a link to the podcast here. On the link, see Topic No. 5, “Should music from a doctrinally compromised source be judged on its own?” The question about Bethel Music, followed by Greg’s answer, starts at 00.51:57. I was also pleased to hear Greg refer his listeners to one of my co-authored books, God’s Super-Apostles, and this blog, especially since Greg’s podcast is one of my favorites.


Holly Pivec is the co-author of A New Apostolic Reformation?: A Biblical Response to a Worldwide Movement and God’s Super-Apostles: Encountering the Worldwide Prophets and Apostles Movement. She has a master’s degree in Christian apologetics from Biola University.

  • No Related Post
Follow Discussion

10 Responses to “Should our church sing Bethel Music worship songs?”

  1. Ron Rilee Says:

    I would disagree, but from a financial standpoint.  Every time a church sings a song by a CCLI member, they are paying royalties to that person/group.  So Hillsong and Bethel make big $$$$ from churches using their music.

  2. Holly Says:

    You raise a very good point, Ron.

  3. Stpehen Says:

    The devil always takes Gods truth to spin his web of deception to lure even Christians who are not satisfied with the work of salvation and the Holy Writ sound doctrine the bread to nourish our souls but instead want more is it not that what caused  Adam and Eve to fall. I thank God he delivered me out of the Godless Pentecostal and Charismatic movements and brought me to the sound reformed church.

  4. Becky Says:

    I understand why not and have not listened since I saw the errors. Now, I didn’t grow up with hymns and though they are close to the Word I just can’t get to like them. Where to find what I CAN listen to that comes close to contemporary worship? Every time I ask this it is always quiet on the other side?? I’ve enjoyed Shane and Shane but what else is there?

  5. Jaeson1992 Says:

    I think the problem is their music lures people into the teaching (or can).  Like “oh yes I loVE that song let me get their album” . then the next thing you know they are like “oh what church is that from?” and then they start listening to Bill Johnson.  That would be my main concern.  Also the church might be paying royalties to use it (as someone above mentioned).  

    Having come out of this whack a doodle movement I still remember a lot of their songs, I used to really like them, however knowing that they believe some very odd things, and that many of their songs have latter rain ideology tangled throughout, I now just cringe when I hear them.

  6. Donald Bate Says:

    Greg Koukl did not give an answer (singular), he gave two alternative answers, both considered reasonable choices. We have just one record of Jesus and his disciples singing, in Matthew 26:30/Mark 14:26, but of course no further information is given about what hymn they sung or who penned it, so we are none the wiser. Personally I lean towards keeping the source pure, so that my conscience is clear before God. For example, in Deuteronomy 23:18 we see that God does not want money brought into the temple to pay a vow (in itself a righteous act) if earned by prostitution (ie. a defiled source). Perhaps that is an extreme example and not in context, but do you agree with the principle, when applied to bringing our gift of worship to God?

  7. Glenn E. Chatfield Says:

    I wrote an open letter to worship leaders about this very subject, and I think my argument against using material from groups like Bethel is solid.

  8. Elizabeth Says:

    The problem is the culture speak of the NAR and company. 
    Their connotation of biblical language and passages has been altered. Take Psalm 46:10 Be still and 
    know that I am God …  the meaning of this passage has been corrupted to mean people getting to know their inner divinity. 
    there are many other examples
    Ie.  intimacy with God – a good and godly desire is corrupted to mean a romantic longing, exacerbated by women wearing revealing clothing while they  purport to be leading worship. 
    I have determined in my heart to do without music that I like and to try to seek after ways of worshiping God in a manner That pleases Him. This is where we(I) stumble: are we  seeking to please God or are we seeking to please ourselves?   This applies  to everything. And in the Scriptures I think we find that the wof ship that is acceptable unto the Lord is pure from its very beginning to the very end and the same time it is defined by God. Not man.

  9. David Pitts Says:

    Donald. There is little doubt that the hymn Jesus and his disciples would have sung was part of the Hallel Psalms (Psalms 113-118). So, we have a clear idea who penned it. As a good Jew, Jesus would have sung these scriptures. Just look at a few excerpts from Psalms 116. 

    The snares of death encompassed me, the pangs of Sheol laid hold on me; I suffered distress and anguish. Then I called on the name of the LORD; ”O LORD, I beg you, save my life!”… For you have delivered my soul from death, my eyes from tears, my feet from stumbling; I walk before the LORD in the land of the living…
    What shall I render to the LORD for all his bounty to me? I will lift up the cup of salvation and call on the name of the LORD… O LORD, I am your servant; I am your servant, the son of your handmaid. You have loosed my bonds. I will offer you the sacrifice of thanksgiving… (Psalm 116:3-4, 8-9, 12-13, 16-17)
    What’s my point? Personally, I would love to see the church sing from the scriptures rather than other writings. How many times do I find myself knowing the words to a song by memory without ever trying to memorize it. If only I were singing the scriptures, then, I would have them memorized. Yet, in the church we seem determined to sing other things. We love what other writers write more than we love the scripture.

  10. Tim Says:

    I have visited churches that will use a Bethel Music, unbeknownst to me, as I have worshiped with them because they do not put on the overhead the name of the song or where it came form. It makes it very hard to worship unless I really know the songs lyrics. I end up having to read along for the first pass through of the song and then join in if I feel that the song is theologically correct. I am not sure how they get away with doing that. Are they not supposed to “credit” the song on the “big screen”?

Leave a Reply

* Please read my Comment Policy